Site Contents  •  Contact

Zoroastrian Heritage

Author: K. E. Eduljee

spacer

Contents

spacer

Turkmenistan Region

Turkmenistan Region & Zoroastrianism

Overview

Turkmenistan and Zoroastrianism

Silk Roads

Kopet Dag Mountains

Kara Kum Desert

Nisa, Anau, Kopet Dag Foothills

Nisaya, Nisa

Raphael Pumpelly - Champion of a Central Asian Cradle of Civilization

Anau

Fredrik Hiebert

Why Pumpelly Remains Unknown

Resumption of Anau Excavations

Ancient Kopet Dag Foothill Townships

Mouru - Gonur 1

Mouru & Murgab River Delta

Region & Zoroastrianism

Tepe or Depe

Gonur

The Archaeological Site

Description of Ancient Gonur

Water Management

Mouru - Gonur 2

Temple

Speculation About the Use of Haoma

Claims Regarding Gonur/Margush/Turkmenistan as the Birthplace of Zoroaster or Zoroastrianism

Necropolis & Burial Customs

Gonur Artefacts

Abandonment of Gonur

Age, People & Culture

Mouru - Gonur 3

Kelleli

Toguluk / Togulok

Adji Kui

Taip

Very Poor Archaeological Practices

Viktor Sarianidi

BMAC & Andronovo Archaeological Complexes

Mouru - Merv

Location

Endangered Site

History & Cities of Merv

Erk Kala

Gyaur Kala

Sultan Kala

Abdullah Khan Kala

Bairam Ali Khan Kala

Parthava (Parthia)

Zoroastrianism, Iranshahr, Language

Preface

Origins of the Parthava (Parthians)

Relationship Between the Parthava (Parthians) and Other Saka

The Names Parthava, Parthia and Pahlavi

Parthava (Parthians) & Zoroastrianism

Parthava (Parthia) & Nisaim, the Fifth Vendidad Nation

Recompilation of the Avesta by Parthava (Parthian) King Valakhsh (Vologeses) IV

Fire Temples of Parthava

Zoroastrian Practices During Parthavi (Parthian) Times

Parthava (Parthians) Saviours of Iran-Shahr & the Iranian-Aryan Family

Parthavi Names

Language: Parthian & Pahlavi

The Spoken Language: Arshaki Parthavi (Arsacid Parthian)

Written Language or Script

References

Parthava (Parthia)

Historical Places

Parthua-Nisa

Caspian Gates

Hecatompylos

References

Ancient Kopet Dag Foothill Townships - Nisa & Anau

Turkmenistan Region Page 2


Turkmenistan Region Pages:

» Page 1: Turkmenistan Region Introduction

» Page 3: Mouru - Gonur

» Page 4: Mouru - Merv


Parthava Pages:

» Region & People

» Historical Milestones

» Historical Places


Nisaya, Nisa - Fifth Vendidad Nation

Nisaim, the fifth nation mentioned in the Vendidad, is identified with the later nations of Nisaya & Nisa. The capital of Nisa was Nisa city. Ancient Nisa was destroyed by an earthquake, which occurred during the first decade BC.

The ancient nation of Nisa would have extended along the Kopet Dag mountains in both directions later becoming Parthava (Parthia). Its eastern neighbour would have been Mouru. The foothills of the Kopet Dag are scattered with the ruins of an ancient civilization, a fact that did not go unnoticed by Raphael Pumpelly, geologist from New York, in the early 1900s.

Ruins located near modern-day Bagir village, 18 km southwest of Ashgabat, the capital of Turkmenistan, and alongside the foothills of the Kopet Dag mountains, have been identified as Nisa and was said to have been founded by Arshak (Arsaces) I (reigned c. 247-211 BCE), the founder of the Parthian empire, and reputedly became the royal necropolis of the Parthian kings. Nisa was later renamed Mithradatkirt (fortress of Mithradat(a)/Mithridates) by Mithradat(a) I of Parthava (reigned c. 171-138 BCE).

The ruins include impressive buildings and fortifications, mausoleums and shrines, inscribed documents, and a treasury robbed of its contents. The artefacts found include art and ivory drinking cups with their outer rims decorated with ancient Iranian classical mythological scenes and themes. The ruins were declared a World Heritage Site by UNESCO in 2007.

Some have identified the ruins at Nisa with Parthaunisa, the first capital city of the Parthians, prior to its destruction by an earthquake.


Aerial view from the north of the Nisa ruins
Aerial view from the north of the Nisa ruins. Image credit: History Hunters international

Raphael Pumpelly (1837-1923)
Champion of a Central Asian Cradle of Civilization

Raphael Pumpelly
Raphael Pumpelly

More than a century ago an unlikely geologist from New York put forth a proposition that "the fundamentals of civilization - organized village life, agriculture, the domestication of animals, weaving," (including mining and metal work) "originated in the oases of Central Asia long before the time of Babylon."

Raphael Pumpelly arrived at this conclusion after visiting Central Asia as a geologist and observing the ruins of cities on the ancient shorelines of huge, dried inland seas. By studying the geology of the area, he became one of the first individuals to investigate how environmental conditions could influence human settlement and culture. Pumpelly speculated that a large inland sea in central Asia might have once supported a sizeable population. He knew from his travels and study that the climate in Central Asia had become drier and drier since the time of the last ice age. As the sea began to shrink, it could have forced these people to move west, bringing civilization to westward and to the rest of the world. He hypothesized that the ruins of cities he saw were evidence of a great ancient civilization that existed when Central Asia was more wet and fertile than it is now.

Such assertions that civilization as we know it originated in Central Asia sounded radical at a time when the names of Egypt and Babylon, regions connected to the Bible, were considered to be the cradle of civilization. But Raphael Pumpelly was persistent. Forty years after his first trip to Central Asia, he convinced the newly established Andrew Carnegie Foundation to fund an expedition. Since the Russians controlled Central Asia, he charmed the authorities in Saint Petersburg into granting him permission for an archaeological excavation. The latter even provided Pumpelly with a private railcar. At the age of 65, Pumpelly was given the opportunity to prove his theory and he wasted no time in starting his work.


Anau

map showing location of Anau
Map showing location of Anau & Kopet Dag Mountains
Image credit: Discover Magazine

On a previous trip, while travelling on Trans-Caspian railway along the foothills of rugged Kopet-Dag mountains which rise up to form the vast Iranian plateau, the three mounds or kurgans at Anau had caught Raphael Pumpelly's eye.

Anau is a site eight kilometres southeast of Turkmenistan's Ashgabat modern-day capital, Ashgabat, and its name is derived from Abi-Nau, meaning new water. In earlier times, its name was Gathar.

In the delta around Anau, there are three mounds or kurgans (also called tepe or depe), each containing ruins from a different period. The north mound has layers from the 5th millennium BCE to the 3rd millennium BCE, at which time in history the river Keltechinar appears to have changed course causing a population shift to the south mound that has layers from the mid-3rd millennium BCE to the 1st millennium BCE (the Bronze Age). The east mound has the most recent (medieval to classical period) ruins.

In 1886, a Russian general A. V. Komarov who mistakenly thought the mound was an ancient burial site with treasure worth plundering, had his army brigade cut through the north mound, bisecting the mound. When Pumpelly visited the site in 1903, his training as a geologist enabled him to see twenty stratified occupational layers in this trench. Pumpelly returned to the site in 1904 to start excavations along the Russian trench using sophisticated methods - methods in stark contrast with the plundering dig of the Russians.


Anau tepe in the distance
Anau tepe in the distance

Pumpelly carefully excavated the north mound by digging a series of eight terraces and shafts. He carefully labelled the position of each item he uncovered. He employed fine-scale archaeology methods (methods that are now utilized by modern archaeologists) by using sieves to capture seeds and tiny bones. Then he had specialists, such as botanists and anatomists, analyze his finds. These pioneering methods would only gradually be used by archaeologists over the next century. In the absence of modern methods like radiocarbon dating, Pumpelly used his training as a geologist, keeping careful stratigraphic records to date sites. His findings would come close to matching data collected years later using modern technology and at considerably greater cost.

Pumpelly's early interest in how humans respond to environmental change is still a keynote feature of archaeology. The kurgan digs unearthed pottery, objects of stone and metal, hearths and cooking utensils - even the remains of skeletons of children found near hearths. He discovered evidence of domesticated animals and cultivated wheat - evidence of the civilization the sought.


Watch towers along Anau city walls
Watch towers along Anau city walls

Later Pumpelly was to write in his memoirs, "A close watch was kept to save every object, large and small,... and to note its relation to its surroundings. I insisted that every shovelful contained a story if it could be interpreted." Indeed, every shovelful, even grain, and every shard had a story to tell.

The story of Anau that emerged was one of a planned walled city that was home to a community that farmed wheat, manufactured artefacts and traded with its neighbours.

His work had barely begun, when in 1904 a plague of locusts "filled the trenches faster than they could be shovelled," and plunged the area into famine, forcing him to abandon the dig, never to return. This phenomenon should not go unnoticed since it might provide clues on the reasons why some settlements appear to have been abandoned in ancient times.

Traveling eastward, he noted the mounds dotting the foothills of the Kopet-Dag, indicating that Anau was not an isolated town, but part of a community of settlements that stretched for a few hundred kilometres, settlements that based themselves on the waters and fertile soil brought down from the mountains. Leaving the mountains, Pumpelly followed the river Murgab north towards the Kara Kum desert. Extreme heat stopped him from exploring the upper reaches of the Murgab delta. Had he done so, he could surely have arrived on the unmistakeable depe mounds of Gonur. That discovery would have to wait for another seventy years and the efforts of a Russian archaeologist of Greek descent, Viktor Sarianidi.


Fredrik Hiebert

Why Pumpelly Remains Unknown

Given Raphael Pumpelly's extraordinary work and his use of methods that future archaeologists would emulate in years to come, why is it that very few people have ever heard of Pumpelly?

Fredrik Hiebert, an archaeologist with the National Geographic Society and formerly a professor of anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania, who conducted a 1988 dig in the Kara Kum Desert, says that one of the reasons why Pumpelly has been ignored by other archaeologists was their need to defend established theories and resulting bias. In 1904, Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Mediterranean were the accepted great centres of civilization. "So why in the world would Pumpelly have gone to Turkmenistan to look for civilization? To his peers, it made no sense; people couldn't comprehend it."


American team works at Anau
American team works at Anau
with the the Kopet-Dag mountains in the background
Photo credit: Kenneth Garrett at Discover Magazine

Resumption of Anau Excavations

Hiebert returned to Turkmenistan in 1993 following Turkmenistan's independence from Russia, this time choosing to work at Anau in collaboration with a Turkmen colleague, Dr. Murad Kurbansakhatov. In 1996, digging in the same kurgan (or tepe / depe meaning mound) Pumpelly had dug in 1904, Hiebert notes: "We dug further down than Pumpelly had been able to do, and what we found was a confirmation of everything he believed." There was early evidence of civilization in the form of farming - specifically, tiny grains of white wheat, proof, says Hiebert, that the Turkmen people were engaged in agricultural production as early as 6,500 years ago. Hiebert's wife, a zoo-archaeologist (who joined the dig just as Pumpelly's wife Eliza had 95 years earlier), discovered bones of domesticated animals. "So here we were, almost 100 years after Raphael Pumpelly had been here, confirming that he was right."

According to Dr. Hiebert, while Anau is a small site compared to nearby Silk Road sites like Namazga depe and Altyn depe, it none-the-less shows evidence of involvement in a wide-reaching, managed system of distribution and trade occurring at perhaps hundreds of sites throughout the Central Asian Bronze Age period. "This pattern of small and large settlements having elite and bureaucratic functions is unique to the area," notes Dr. Hiebert.

In his report, Dr. Hiebert stated, "We like Anau because it was occupied for almost every period. Deposits stretch from the earliest village way of life (4500 BCE) to a Bronze Age town (2300 BCE) to a walled classical city (2nd c. BCE) which was eventually topped by a medieval mosque (1500th c CE) with glistening blue-green glazed tiles."


Seal from Anau with unknown writing or markings
Seal from Anau with unknown markings

During his excavations, Dr. Hiebert uncovered a unique engraved stamp seal made from a shiny jet-black stone. The seal bore an inscription that was emphasized with a reddish brown pigment. The design of the inscription does not match any known writing or symbol system. Researchers are careful not to claim this is a form of writing, for if it were, it would represent one of the earliest writing systems known. Writes Dr. Hiebert: "Seals are used in the administrative system of an economy that needs to keep track of goods such as supplies for temples, barracks, or palaces."


Excavation unit in which stamp seal was dicovered
Hiebert excavation unit where seal was discovered

Dr. Hiebert's team discovered the stamp seal while excavating at the base of the Bronze Age mound at Anau. There they uncovered the eroded top of a very large, surprisingly well-built building with walls, that even 4300 years later, stand nearly two meters tall. Inside the rooms, archaeologists found the remains of finely made ceramics, some clearly from other regions, as well as and numerous pieces of clay used to seal vessels or parcels.

In 2004, on the occasion of the 100th anniversary conference of Pumpelly's 1904 Anau dig, Raphael's great-granddaughter Lisa Pompelli (who uses the original spelling of her family's Italian surname), accompanied Hiebert and his archaeological team to Turkmenistan to attend the conference and celebrate the opening of that country's museum devoted entirely to wheat and its early cultivation.


Ancient Kopet Dag Foothill Townships

Archaeological sites along the northern foothills of the Kopet Dag Mountains
Archaeological sites along the northern foothills of the Kopet Dag Mountains
Image credit: A Central Asian village at the dawn of civilization, excavations at Anau, Turkmenistan
by Fredrik Talmage Hiebert, Kakamurad Kurbansakhatov, Hubert Schmidt

Following the ground breaking excavations and observations of Raphael Pumpelly, discoveries of the settlement of early prehistoric civilizations along the northern foothills of the Kopet Dag mountains are rewriting the history books. This vast archipelago of settlements stretches across 6,000 square kilometres. Modern dating methods date a settlement at Djeitun (not very far from Anau - see site #13 in the map above, #18 being Anau North) at c. 6500 BCE (Ceramic Neolithic period). Two other nearby sites #11. Togolok and #12 Chopan also date back to the early Djeitun period.

A number of the sites, for instance Altyn depe (#32 above and meaning golden hill), contain artefacts from Harappa in the Indus valley and Sumer / Mesopotamia in the Tigris-Euphrates valley indicating extensive and far-reaching trading along the Silk Roads during the Eneolithic Age (between the late 4th and the late 3rd millennia BCE). (cf. Altyn-Depe by Vadim Mikhailovich Masson and Henry N. Michael, Published by Univ. of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology.)

If because of climate change, the fertile areas had been receding south towards the mountains, it is reasonable to expect that earlier settlements might have existed in areas that are now part of the dessert. The earliest settlements discovered to this point show well established farming and building techniques. These would not have suddenly manifested themselves but would have taken generations to develop.

In many ways the work of discovering the secrets of the past has only just started. Impeded that war and a changing political environment, the world is only just waking up to the possibility that the Aryan heartland of Central Asia may have an equal claim to being the cradle of civilization.

References:
» Altyn-Depe by Vadim Mikhailovich Masson and Henry N. Michael
» Altin / Altyn Depe at Iranica by V. M. Masson
» A Central Asian village at the dawn of civilization, excavations at Anau, Turkmenistan by Fredrik Talmage Hiebert, Kakamurad Kurbansakhatov, Hubert Schmidt
» Historical/Achaeological sites in Turkmenistan

» Top


Turkmenistan Region Pages:

» Page 1: Turkmenistan Region Introduction

» Page 3: Mouru - Gonur

» Page 4: Mouru - Merv


Parthava Pages:

» Region & People

» Historical Milestones

» Historical Places


» Site Contents


Search Our Site: